| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How often does your Vet recommend that your dog be given core vaccines? |
| Every Year |
|
33% |
[ 5 ] |
| Every 2 Years |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
| Every 3 Years |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| Less often than every 3 Years |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| Titers tests yearly |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Roscoe P |
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:02 pm Post subject: Updated: Core canine vaccination frequency |
|
|
Today?
Last edited by Guest on Sat Apr 08, 2006 9:09 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mom2dogs |
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the poll function is broken.
My vet recommends an every 3 yr plan (after puppy combo vax and puppy 1 yr rabies) or titers. They told me they stopped vaccinating their own animals over 6 yrs ago.
I use titers for everything except a 3 yr rabies vax as required by law. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| CatsRus |
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I vote that you follow your vet's scheduled vaccination plan and preventative care suggestions. If you don't agree, find another vet.
My only 2 peeves with this is that people are "telling" their vets what they will do and when the vet disagrees, they just don't go any more. You still need to find a vet to support "your" chosen path.
My second peeve is that putting more space between vax does not mean skipping other preventative care. Vet visits and other medical preventions (heartworm prevention, flea prevention, etc...) are still important. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| dogfan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| busterbarkley |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually discussed this with my vet yesterday and our schedule (hopefully I got them all):
Barkley (dog)
-rabies in October and then not for 3 years
-parvo every two years (so not this year)
-giardia (sp? a.k.a Beaver Feaver) and kennel cough every year, we do them in May
Buster (cat)
-rabies every 3 years
-distemper every 3 years
-feline leukemia is yearly. this is the one believed to cause sarcomas in some cats.
She gave me the option of injecting the sarcoma causing shots in his hips but advised it's more painful, the shoulder doesn't cause much discomfort. I've decided to continue having their shots in the shoulder since if a tumor develops I would remove that if it would help them but I would not remove a leg (which is the only reason for injecting it in the hips) so I've opted for less discomfort since the cat already hates vets.
We also do shots twice a year instead of all at once because we both feel it's easier on their systems (and then everyone gets weighed and if the cat is having --rear end-- gland issues they tend to happen around appointment time anyway). And if doing multiple shots she will do one per shoulder so if they have a reaction we know which shot caused it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| cas |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't vaccinate my 16 1/2 year old yorkie Ben any longer - just do titers - he's got liver disease so, I am very careful about his veterinary care. I also didn't do his 3 year Rabies this year - I got a waiver for my township from my vet. When I was vaccinating him I never got the shots all at once - I spread them out so that his system wasn't overloaded.
For my newly adopted dog Peter who is about 6 years old, he had to have the DHP and Rabies 1st year and booster since we didn't know his medical history. From here forward I will do titers and see if any further vaccinations are necessary.
I think that yearly bloodwork is as important as vaccinations and as they get older twice yearly bloodwork is necessary. I didn't do bloodwork every year with my first two dogs but, I am learning how important it is - especially for a senior. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mom2dogs |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| busterbarkley wrote: |
She gave me the option of injecting the sarcoma causing shots in his hips but advised it's more painful, the shoulder doesn't cause much discomfort. I've decided to continue having their shots in the shoulder since if a tumor develops I would remove that if it would help them but I would not remove a leg (which is the only reason for injecting it in the hips) so I've opted for less discomfort since the cat already hates vets.
We also do shots twice a year instead of all at once because we both feel it's easier on their systems (and then everyone gets weighed and if the cat is having gland issues they tend to happen around appointment time anyway). And if doing multiple shots she will do one per shoulder so if they have a reaction we know which shot caused it. |
I lost both of my cats to injection site sarcomas... The reason they suggest the hip is so they can remove the leg to prevent the spread of the disease. The tumors "finger out" and it's very hard to get a clean margin in a small animal like a cat at the shoulder... my one cat had the sarcoma wrapped around the jugular vein etc. and the vet basically removed the mass but wasn't able to get a clean margin. In my other cat, the sarcoma went from the shoulder into the lungs. On the upper part of the body, there is just a lot of vital stuff for the sarcoma to invade...
My cat's lasted less than 6 mo after their initial surgery. It's a terrible way to lose an animal. I don't think vets have many good options for this dilemma (vaccinate vs. risk of sarcoma)...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| busterbarkley |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh I know why they suggest the hips, but I'm not willing to remove the cat's leg, knowing him the quality of life wouldn't be there so since I won't put him through that the shots might just as well be less painful.
I did have a dog we lost to cancer and amputation the leg was considered. I also decided there not to remove her leg after considering what was involved for the surgery, recovery and what that would do to her.
Personally I don't think the time we would buy is worth putting the animal through that. But it's a choice everyone has to make for themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mom2dogs |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is a choice...
Surprisingly, most "tripods" get along amazingly well... I had a pup who had a front leg removed including part of the clavicle... he was up and about 3 hrs after surgery. He lived to the ripe old age of 13(!) and he was a BIG dog!!
If I had it to do over again, I would have a hard time vaccinating in the shoulder. But I don't think I'll ever own another cat after the heartache of losing two to my own stupidity so close together... It's something I regret terribly. These were indoor cats who were at very low risk for exposure, and I essentially killed them with my decision.
My vet is a very good friend, so I follow her lead in vaccinating her own animals. She hasn't vaxed in 6 yrs. but does titers instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| busterbarkley |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For Sheba by the time we caught the cancer our vet wasn't sure removing her leg would help since there was a very good chance the cancer spread. So if it had we would have put her through the surgery for nothing - and there was a good possibility the "shock" of losing her leg would have caused her additional stress. We decided to make her time left happy and as normal as possible and she lived 7 more months.
With Buster (the cat), he's already extremely overweight (no luck getting that weight down) and as a result mobility would be an issue with only 3 legs, at risk for diabetes, hates the vet..... I just don't see it being an option for him. I have nothing against 3 legged pets, I've seen them get around fine, I just don't think he would be one of them. And I'm pretty sure one more surgery would be more stress for him then it would be worth. I've spent a long time thinking about it.
I do understand your feelings of guilt. There's no easy answer for that unfortunately. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mom2dogs |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| busterbarkley wrote: | | I do understand your feelings of guilt. There's no easy answer for that unfortunately. |
Well, I probably have 20 yrs or so left to guilt over it... then I'll be dead too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Snuffles |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My dogs get the core vaccines (including rabies) every three years. Bordatella (nasal) vaccine and heartworm test annually.
My cat gets core vaccines every three years. We don't do the feline leukemia vaccine--my vet doesn't recommend it for indoor only cats. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| CatsRus |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do feel this is an important subject, I have zero first hand experience with it since we have not had any occurences in the 10-15 years of experience my group members have...or my vets. My vets can remember a handful of "possible" reactions.
I read the links provided as "studies". The problem is they seem to be from the same core source of material, rephrased and represented in various formats with some experiential data thrown in. The words theorize and feel and evidence is building are used frequently in the information and when they offer actual numbers of animals involved, it is very small.
I don't understand why we cannot actually get some REAL studies going. Instead, we are going to pick yet another arbitrary number for the protocol? It makes me nervous...I don't want the VAS drama, but I HAVE lost pets to distemper, parvo, panaleuk, corona, etc... so I KNOW those are dangerous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mom2dogs |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wish someone would fund a comprehensive study, but it is not in the vaccine makers best (financial) interest to do so...
I've seen a whole litter lost to bad 5 in 1 from Fort Dodge and won't use any of their stuff anymore. They've switched to Intervet brand and now use the Dodd protocol for pups.
It's so confusing for the average pet owner... and vets don't seem to have the kind of answers we need to make these decisions for our pets either... lose-lose situation in most cases. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Eiredale1 |
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mom2dogs wrote: | | I wish someone would fund a comprehensive study, but it is not in the vaccine makers best (financial) interest to do so.... |
Actually, Purdue University is conducting a study on possible adverse effects of vaccines on dogs. They are conducting two studies, one involving beagles and the other with Great Danes:
www.homestead.com/VonHapsburg/haywardstudyonvaccines.html
Also, here is a website with info on a study in England that analyzed the case histories of thousands of dogs:
www.bogartsdaddy.com/bouvier/health/vaccination-concerns-uk.htm
Finally, here's some more info, based on clinical observations of Dr. Jean Dodd:
www.naturalrearing.com/J_In_Learning/Immunization/vaccinations/VACCINATIONSPart4.htm
I've been having titers done annually on my dogs for the past few years after learning about a study conducted in England on giant breed dogs. Supposedly, dogs of these notoriously short-lived breeds were on average living longer when titers were done rather than following a set vaccine schedule. (Naturally, I can't find any info regarding this particular study now that I'm looking for it!!!) For me, the fact that my dogs' titers show they've got sufficient antibodies justifies not vaccinating them until there's an indication that they need it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|