NYC public housing to enact breed bans, weight limit

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

bucky pit bull.jpg

Bucky at Waggin’ Train Rescue in NYC is a great dog, but he will not be allowed to live in public housing.

I was dismayed to get an alert from the ASPCA that the New York City Housing Authority is implementing a new pet policy, effective May 1 (i.e. Friday!) that bans purebred or mixed breed Pit Bulls, Dobermans and Rottweilers.

The new policy also lowers the weight limit for allowable dogs from the previous limit of 40 lbs. to 25 lbs.

The most important thing to note is that, as the ASPCA notes: “Dogs already registered with NYCHA before the implementation of
this revised policy, regardless of breed and providing they do not
exceed the current 40 pound weight limit, will be grandfathered and
allowed to remain in NYCHA housing.”

Residents whose pets are not registered have until April 30 to submit a registration form, and have 90 days to obtain veterinarian certification that their dog is spayed or neutered, vaccinated against rabies and licensed by the Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene.

For more information and links to all the necessary forms, visit the ASPCA Web site.


While I’m glad this policy requires that pets in public housing be vaccinated and spayed or neutered, I’m dismayed that, in this time of economic crisis, New York City is targeting those pet parents who have managed to keep their pets in their homes despite the expense.

The city is also placing a tremendous burden on the already overwhelmed Animal Care & Control of NYC, which overflows with Pit Bulls and Rottweilers during the best of times. Now not only will there be fewer homes to which they can adopt these dogs, but the AC&C will presumably be the final destination for those dogs forced out of their homes by the new policy.

(While the previous 40-lb. weight limit should have theoretically kept most dogs of those three breeds out of public housing, the limit was, to my knowledge, not strictly enforced — and how many of us have found the dogs we adopted as puppies unexpectedly grew, Clifford the Big Red Dog-style, well beyond their expected adult size?)

The fact is, breed-specific legislation simply does not improve public safety. Irresponsible pet owners and practices that increase the risk of dog bites, such as chaining, should be the real targets of legislation. (Check out this site, StopBSL.com, which lists alternatives to BSL that really will protect the public from dog bites without targeting responsible pet parents.)

Quite frankly, as a New York City Pit Bull parent myself, it makes me very nervous to see any form of BSL in my hometown. They may not be coming for my dog this time, but I know I could be next.

Previous entries:

Pit bulls, other breeds banned in military housing

Is this breed-specific legislation not such a bad idea?

Happy Tail: Sacrificing to save an abused, overlooked pit bull

Is it natural to fear Pit Bulls? And what can we do about it?

Giving a voice to dogfighting victims: Watch the video

All pit bull blog entries

Comments